Google has settled an antitrust lawsuit with Match Group, the parent company of dating apps like Tinder, OkCupid, and Hinge. The legal action accused Google of misusing its power in app distribution by compelling Match Group to utilize its in-app payment system. Both companies jointly agreed to the settlement, effectively avoiding the trial scheduled for the following week.
As per Bloomberg, Google will return the $40 million held in escrow by Match Group, initially intended for covering service fees owed to Google amid their ongoing dispute.
A Google spokesperson conveyed contentment regarding the settlement with Match Group, affirming the importance of maintaining a secure and high-quality experience for shared users on Google Play. They emphasized the necessity for Google to invest in the Android ecosystem and enhance an app’s complete lifecycle.
Match Group, responsible for Tinder and other dating apps, had taken legal action against Google in 2022, alleging an antitrust violation. The complaint suggested that Google had forced Match to adopt the Play Store billing system or face removal of their apps from the Play Store. Google had previously assured Match that they could use their payment system, rejecting app updates that upheld Match’s payment system.
The settlement includes a stipulation for Match Group to implement a “user choice billing” feature by March 31, 2024. This feature will allow users to make payments using systems other than Google’s. While a 15%-30% commission is typically charged by Google, the settlement offers a lower 4% discount.
Despite this lawsuit settlement, Google and Match Group will continue collaboration in various other areas, including Google Cloud and the use of Google’s AI technologies. However, another antitrust case against Google, brought by Fortnite developer Epic Games, is still slated for trial on November 2.
Apple has also faced similar antitrust lawsuits, including one from Epic Games over App Store policies. Apple won the case, though the court hinted at the possibility of allowing third-party payment options. Apple might continue pursuing further appeals against this particular ruling.
